1. Lebendfotos

1.1. Falter

2. Diagnose

2.1. Weibchen

1-3: Holotypus ♀, Daten siehe Etiketten (fot.: Ernst Brockmann, Fotos bearbeitet: Michel Kettner), coll. Zentrum für Biodokumentation, Landsweiler-Reden.

3. Weitere Informationen

3.1. Typenmaterial

Grishin (2025e: 27-28) beschrieb die Art nach einem einzigen Falter: “Holotype: ♀ deposited in the collection of the Zentrum für Biodokumentation des Saarlandes, Schiffweiler, Germany (ZfBS), illustrated in Fig. 16a, bears the following four rectangular labels (2^nd handwritten, others printed), three white: [ Rio Aguacatal | Colomb. W.Codr. | 2000 m | Coll. Fassl ], [ dius ♀ ], [ DNA sample ID: | NVG-18056D11 | c/o Nick V. Grishin ], and one red [ HOLOTYPE ♀ | Entheus | pico Grishin ]. Judging from its handwritten label, the dorsal side of this specimen was illustrated as a female of E. dius in Draudt (1921–1924). The illustration (plate 172, row f, image [1]) bears good resemblance to this specimen, which is not E. dius. The outer marginal area of the right hindwing and the tornus of the left hindwing of the holotype were repaired by attaching wing parts of different specimen(s). These wing pieces are excluded from the holotype.”

3.2. Literatur

• Erstbeschreibung: Zhang, J., Cong, Q., Shen, J., Song, L. & N. V. Grishin (2025e): Update to: New butterfly taxa and findings from genomic analyses. — The Taxonomic Report of the International Lepidoptera Survey 13 (1): 1-70. [PDF auf digitalcommons.unl.edu]